Advertisement

firehouse pizza banner

Jarrod Jacobs:The Apostles Commands

I remember not long after I started in my first “full-time” work, I encountered some who took the position that the “red letters” in the Bible were more important than the “black letters.” In other words, we ought to give greater emphasis to the words Christ spoke on earth than to anything else in the New Testament. To them, the epistles, etc., were of lesser value than Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Perhaps you’ve heard of people who have taken such a position. This may seem noble at first, because people wish to place greater emphasis on Christ’s words, but the noble intention has many glaring errors.

 

First of all, it’s a strange position to hold because red-letter Bibles weren’t published until 1901! What about the people from the 1800s and back to the second century? Were they unable to determine the “important words” because their Bibles weren’t typed with red letters? Second, if the words of Christ (in red) have a greater impact than what the apostles said, what about the fact that Christ told them He wasn’t able to tell them everything because they weren’t ready? He then promised the Holy Spirit to come and “guide” them into “all truth” (Jn. 16:12-13). So, the apostles didn’t have all the truth when Christ was on earth, speaking in “red letters”! They did get all of it later (Acts 2:1-5; Gal. 1:12; etc.), yet somehow their words aren’t as important as what Christ said? This is a strange doctrine, indeed.

 

Not only is it a strange doctrine, but it also contradicts passages like II Peter 3:2. Here, Peter told his readers to, “be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the prophets, and of the commandment of us, the apostles of the Lord and Savior.” He’d also later condemn people for twisting Paul’s words and put Paul’s words on an equal plain with “the other Scriptures,” i.e., the Old Testament Scriptures (II Pet. 3:16). This sounds nothing like what I was told about the importance of the “red letters”! Based on the truth Peter taught, let me ask a few questions.

 

  • Jesus said the words He spoke were the words given to Him by the Father (Jn. 12:49-50). Do we now discount the words of Christ as “lesser” than the Father’s?

  • The job of the apostles was to speak the words of Christ to the world (Matt. 28:19; Mk. 16:15; Jn. 14:26). When they did so, how were these words of lesser importance than Christ’s? They were Christ’s!

  • Since the words of the apostles are equated with the words of the prophets of God (II Pet. 3:2), how can we say they are of lesser importance than Christ’s?

  • Since Deity is actually behind the entire Bible (II Tim. 3:16-17; II Pet. 1:20-21), shouldn’t the whole Bible be “red-letter”?

 

Personally, I find the “red letter” Bibles distracting. I mainly preach out of Bibles that have only black letters. Friends, let’s not ignore the words of the apostles, but realize that since these men were Christ’s ambassadors (II Cor. 5:20; Eph. 6:20), their words are as authoritative as Christ’s when it comes to doctrine and truth! Peter said we need to be listening to the commands of the apostles, and so let’s do that and be blessed (II Pet. 3:2)!

 

---

 

You are invited to visit with the Caneyville church of Christ. Times of services: Sun.: 10:00 am, 10:45 am, 5:00 pm; Wed.: 7:00 pm. Website: http://caneyvillechurchofchrist.com Tune in to our radio program 101.5 FM at 5:30 am, Mon-Fri. Questions? Call: (270) 589-4167

Tags: 


Bookmark and Share

Advertisements