Advertisement

firehouse pizza banner

Jarrod Jacobs: Is This Vote About Freedom?

   On January 26th, we were faced with the decision of whether or not to allow alcohol sales in our county. Next, has been the push to allow alcohol sales in certain towns (Morgantown, Woodbury, and Rochester). During this time of decision, we have noted what the Bible says about the recreational use of alcohol in such passages as Proverbs 20:1, 23:29-35, and I Peter 4:3-4. Yet, when discussing this subject, and whether or not alcohol ought to be sold, some ignored what the Bible said and remarked that this vote on September 27th is about freedom.

    For those saying that this vote is about “freedom,” my question is, “Whose freedom is under consideration?” It certainly is not taking into consideration the freedom of those under the age of 21. We have people on record who wish to “legalize” the sale of a substance that will be illegal for those under twenty-one to purchase and consume in our cities. Certain citizens, however, expect voters from 18 to 20 years-old to vote and legalize the sale of a substance that cannot be sold to them legally. Where is the “freedom” in that?

    Some say “drink responsibly.” There are TV and radio ads with the same message. Do we offer this same warning when drinking milk, water, juice, tea, lemonade, etc.? Why not? How can one drink alcohol in a responsible way when, with every drink, the person’s rational ability is eroding? Since it has been said that this vote is about freedom, then I ask, what “freedom” can be realized when one’s mental faculties are being lessened with every drink? This type of reasoning reminds me of II Peter 2:19. Again, “Whose freedom is under consideration?” Alcohol sales are not about bringing personal freedom to people, or we would not have PSA’s warning folks about the dangers of alcohol consumption.

    Can alcohol sales mean financial freedom for the citizens of Butler county? It is a matter of public record that if alcohol sales pass, none of the cities voting can levy any regulatory fees on alcohol sales. Furthermore, those cities cannot rely upon the county to regulate alcohol sales, either. It will be a further financial burden upon the individual cities. On top of this, regardless of whether or not alcohol sales pass, several thousand tax dollars have been spent to provide for two special elections on this subject this year. Is this vote on alcohol really bringing freedom? It is not bringing financial freedom to us!

    Finally, what about the folks who are against alcohol sales in our cities? It was voted down on January 26th by the entire county, and this included the cities of Morgantown, Rochester, and Woodbury. It is evident the majority does not want it. Now, it is being brought back up again for a vote in only three towns (Woodbury, Morgantown, and Rochester). If this is really about freedom, what about the opinions already expressed by voters in January? The majority ruled (this is our system in this country) which said we do not want it. What about the freedom of the majority to say we do not want Butler County to have alcohol sales, and to keep it that way? Is this really about freedom for all or freedom for some?

    Let us turn to Christ and not the bottle. In Christ we find true freedom (Jn. 8:31-32, 36; II Cor. 3:17).

-- You are invited to visit with the Caneyville church of Christ. Times of services: Sun.: 10:00 am, 10:45 am, 5:00 pm; Wed.: 7:00 pm. Website: http://caneyvillechurchofchrist.com Tune in to our radio program 101.5 FM at 5:30 am, Mon-Fri. Questions? Call: (270) 589-4167

Tags: 


Bookmark and Share

Advertisements